What must be demonstrated to show that a loss is not too remote for a claim?

To establish that a loss is not too remote for a claim, it must be demonstrated that the loss was foreseeable. In legal terms, foreseeability relates to the idea that a reasonable person in the defendant's position could predict that their actions might cause harm or loss to the claimant. This concept is rooted in the principle of proximity and fair balance in liability.

When assessing foreseeability, courts look at the context surrounding the breach of duty and consider whether the specific type of loss that occurred was a natural consequence of the wrongful act. If the loss was a reasonable outcome that could have been anticipated, it is less likely to be deemed too remote. Establishing foreseeability helps to connect the defendant’s actions to the plaintiff's injuries in a way that aligns with the broader principles of fairness and responsibility in tort law.

In contrast, the other options address different aspects of liability and damage but do not directly relate to the specific requirement of foreseeability in establishing connectedness between the breach and the loss incurred.